Yandex Releases Perforator 0.0.7: Enhanced Open-Source Profiling Tool

In the fast-evolving world of software optimization, Yandex has once again pushed the boundaries with the release of Perforator version 0.0.7, a tool designed to revolutionize how developers tackle code inefficiencies at scale. Originally open-sourced earlier this year, Perforator serves as a continuous profiling solution that monitors performance in real-time, helping organizations identify bottlenecks that could otherwise drain resources and inflate costs.

This latest update, detailed in a report from Phoronix, introduces several key enhancements aimed at making the tool more robust for enterprise environments. Among them are improved support for multi-threaded applications, enhanced data visualization capabilities, and better integration with popular CI/CD pipelines, allowing teams to embed performance checks directly into their development workflows.

Enhancing Scalability in High-Stakes Environments

For industry insiders, the appeal of Perforator lies in its ability to operate across vast codebases without the overhead typically associated with traditional profilers. Yandex claims that by pinpointing inefficiencies early, businesses can save billions in server infrastructure costs—a bold assertion backed by their own internal deployments, as highlighted in a GlobeNewswire release from February.

The tool’s architecture leverages lightweight instrumentation to collect metrics continuously, rather than in isolated bursts, which means developers get a holistic view of application behavior under real-world loads. This is particularly valuable for cloud-native setups where microservices and distributed systems amplify the impact of even minor code flaws.

Unpacking the New Features for Developers

Diving deeper into the 0.0.7 release, one standout addition is the refined flame graph generation, which now supports customizable thresholds for highlighting performance hotspots. According to discussions on the Phoronix Forums, users have praised this for its precision in large-scale Linux environments, where open-source tools often struggle with granularity.

Integration with existing ecosystems has also been bolstered; Perforator now plays nicer with Kubernetes orchestrations, enabling automated profiling in containerized deployments. This aligns with broader trends in DevOps, where performance tuning is no longer an afterthought but a core part of the pipeline.

Real-World Applications and Cost Savings

In practice, companies like Yandex have used Perforator to optimize search algorithms and backend services, reportedly reducing CPU usage by significant margins. The Phoronix coverage from January underscores how this open-source initiative democratizes access to such capabilities, previously confined to proprietary systems at tech giants.

Critics, however, note that while the tool excels in Linux-centric setups, its adoption in mixed-OS environments might require additional tweaks. Still, for insiders focused on open-source innovation, Perforator represents a step toward more efficient, sustainable computing infrastructures.

Future Implications for Software Engineering

Looking ahead, the iterative improvements in Perforator 0.0.7 signal Yandex’s commitment to fostering a community around performance optimization. As more contributors join via platforms like GitHub, the tool could evolve to address emerging challenges, such as AI workload profiling.

Ultimately, in an era where computational efficiency directly ties to environmental and financial sustainability, tools like Perforator are poised to become indispensable. By weaving continuous profiling into the fabric of development, it empowers teams to build faster, leaner software without the guesswork.

from WebProNews https://ift.tt/puZwH8L

Linus Torvalds Releases Linux Kernel 6.18-rc4 with Driver and Filesystem Fixes

In the ever-evolving world of open-source software, Linus Torvalds has once again advanced the Linux kernel with the release of version 6.18-rc4, marking another step toward stability in what promises to be a pivotal update for developers and enterprises alike. This test release, detailed in a recent report from Phoronix, comes amid a development cycle that Torvalds describes as surprisingly calm, despite initial concerns over regressions spotted in earlier candidates. The kernel’s progression underscores the collaborative rigor that has kept Linux at the forefront of operating systems for servers, embedded devices, and high-performance computing.

Key fixes in this release target a broad spectrum of components, with drivers taking center stage. According to the Phoronix coverage, the bulk of changes address issues in GPU, networking, and sound drivers, reflecting the kernel’s role in supporting diverse hardware ecosystems. Beyond drivers, the update includes refinements to core networking, filesystems like SMB, XFS, and NFSD, as well as scheduler extensions and architecture-specific tweaks for s390 and x86 platforms.

A Closer Look at Regression Resolutions and Testing Dynamics

Torvalds noted in his announcement, as relayed by Phoronix, that while the previous week felt unusually quiet, the size of rc4 aligns with typical patterns, featuring a mix of trivial one-liners and more substantive patches. This includes new self-tests for VFIO-related issues, ensuring that potential vulnerabilities are caught early. The release also builds on feedback from automated testing systems, which had flagged regressions in rc1, though many proved to be configuration quirks rather than kernel flaws.

Industry observers point out that this steady pace bodes well for the final 6.18 stable version, expected later this year. Drawing from Wikipedia’s comprehensive Linux kernel version history, the 6.x series continues a tradition of incremental enhancements, with 6.18 poised to introduce features like new drivers for Tyr and Rocket hardware, haptic touchpads, and DM-PCACHE, as highlighted in earlier Phoronix previews.

Implications for Long-Term Support and Enterprise Adoption

The calm development trajectory is particularly noteworthy given Torvalds’ hints at upcoming changes in release scheduling. In the Phoronix article, he mentions that the next kernel cycle might overlap with the holiday season, potentially extending to eight release candidates—a factor that could influence planning for distributions like Ubuntu or Red Hat Enterprise Linux, which rely on timely upstream integrations.

Moreover, as Neowin reported in its coverage of the preceding rc3 release, the normalcy in testing points to an on-time stable rollout, alleviating concerns for sectors dependent on kernel reliability, such as cloud infrastructure and AI workloads. This release candidate also incorporates x86 fixes merged just ahead of its debut, including updates for AMD model IDs, per Phoronix’s detailed breakdown.

Broader Context in Kernel Evolution and Community Contributions

For industry insiders, the significance of 6.18-rc4 lies in its embodiment of Linux’s adaptive model, where community-driven patches address real-world deployment challenges. LWN.net’s analysis of the rc2 release echoes this, noting resolutions for KVM self-tests and ARM64 debugging, which enhance virtualization and embedded applications—critical for edge computing and IoT.

As the kernel archives on kernel.org confirm, this version builds toward potential long-term support status, similar to predecessors maintained for years by initiatives like the Civil Infrastructure Platform. Enterprises eyeing upgrades should monitor these developments closely, as they could influence everything from security postures to performance optimizations in data centers.

Looking Ahead: Challenges and Opportunities in Open-Source Innovation

Yet, the path forward isn’t without hurdles. Torvalds’ commentary in the Phoronix piece warns of lingering regressions from earlier tests, emphasizing the need for continued community testing. This collaborative ethos, vital to Linux’s success since its 1991 inception, ensures that even minor releases like rc4 contribute to a robust foundation.

In summary, Linux 6.18-rc4 exemplifies the methodical progress that has made the kernel indispensable. As detailed across sources like Phoronix and LWN.net, its fixes and forward-looking features position it as a bridge to more ambitious updates, reinforcing Linux’s dominance in technology infrastructures worldwide.

from WebProNews https://ift.tt/O3HWei0

The Hidden Business Asset of Sound

In every successful business, there are visible assets such as branding, interiors, and customer service that shape perception and performance. Yet one of the most influential elements is often the least noticed: sound. From the steady rhythm of background playlists to the subtle hum of an office environment, sound has become a quiet driver of emotion, behavior, and brand identity.

Background music influences customer decisions, employee moods, and overall brand experience. It is no longer just an afterthought, but part of how modern businesses communicate who they are. 

Sound affects everything from dwell time and purchasing behavior to team morale, and understanding how it works can unlock a surprisingly powerful tool for growth. It is also an area that requires proper licensing and planning, especially when using music for business as part of daily operations.

The Psychology of Sound in Branding

Humans instinctively respond to sound. Music, in particular, influences emotion and memory more directly than visuals or text. For brands, this means sound can create an atmosphere that aligns with what they want customers to feel.

Think about walking into a spa that plays calm, instrumental music. It immediately communicates relaxation and care. A retail store, on the other hand, might use upbeat tracks to suggest energy and excitement. In both cases, the music reinforces the brand’s personality and message.

This is the principle of audio branding, the deliberate use of sound to express identity. Just as a logo represents a business visually, sound does so emotionally. Companies that use sound strategically understand that customers do not just buy products, they buy feelings, and music helps define those feelings.

How Music Shapes Customer Behavior

Sound does not only set a mood; it shapes decisions. Studies in environmental psychology have shown that background music affects how people move, choose, and even spend.

For example, slow-tempo music in restaurants can make guests linger longer, increasing the chance they will order dessert or another drink. Faster music in gyms, meanwhile, encourages activity and stamina. Even volume matters. Music that is too loud can cause stress or early exits, while music that is too soft can make spaces feel lifeless.

The key is congruence. Music should match the setting, audience, and time of day. When done right, it blends seamlessly into the environment, influencing behavior without being consciously noticed. That is what makes it powerful.

Creating an Experience, Not Just Background Noise

Today’s consumers expect more than good products. They expect experiences. Sound plays a central role in this expectation, whether in hospitality, retail, or corporate spaces.

In hotels, playlists transition from morning calm to evening elegance, subtly guiding guest energy throughout the day. In retail stores, carefully selected tracks can make customers feel more confident about purchases or associate the brand with a certain lifestyle.

Even workplaces benefit. Music can improve focus, reduce stress, and strengthen team morale when used thoughtfully. A relaxed, sonically balanced office environment helps employees feel more comfortable and motivated, important factors in retention and productivity.

Businesses that integrate music as part of their environment are not just playing songs. They are curating a soundscape that reinforces who they are and how they want people to feel.

The Overlooked Side: Music Licensing

Despite its benefits, music for commercial use comes with legal responsibilities. Playing music in a business setting, whether through streaming platforms or downloaded files, requires a proper license.

This is because songs are protected intellectual property. Without a license from a performing rights organization (PRO) or an authorized service, businesses risk fines and legal action. Many popular streaming apps, such as Spotify or Apple Music, are licensed for personal use only, not public performance.

Services that specialize in music for business simplify this process. They provide fully licensed tracks and playlists designed for commercial spaces, ensuring compliance with copyright laws while giving businesses access to professionally curated music programs. This makes it possible to focus on the experience without worrying about the legal details.

Integrating Sound Into Business Strategy

For many brands, sound is an untapped resource. Visual design often receives priority in branding discussions, but sound can have just as much influence, sometimes even more. It defines rhythm and emotion, creating cohesion across physical and digital touchpoints.

To build a sound strategy, consider these questions:

• What emotions should customers feel when they enter your space?
  
• Does your music reflect your brand’s personality, whether calm, energetic, sophisticated, or youthful?
  
• Are your employees supported by the right sound environment for productivity?
  
• Are you using legally licensed music that protects your business?

Answering these helps turn background sound into a deliberate asset instead of an afterthought.

Sound as the Silent Partner in Success

The most effective sound design goes unnoticed. It does not demand attention but shapes it, quietly guiding how people behave and feel. Whether it is a retail store, café, gym, or office, the right sound choices influence both mood and memory, making every interaction more meaningful.

As businesses continue to refine their brand presence, sound deserves a seat at the strategy table. In a world filled with visual noise, the right music does not just fill silence. It builds connection, trust, and ambiance that customers remember.

from WebProNews https://ift.tt/aAjPym9

Ben Goertzel Critiques AGI Doomsday Book, Urges Ethical Innovation

In the high-stakes world of artificial general intelligence (AGI), few debates ignite as much passion as the one surrounding humanity’s potential extinction at the hands of superintelligent machines. Ben Goertzel, a veteran AGI researcher and CEO of SingularityNET, has stepped into the fray with a pointed critique of the doomsday narrative peddled by Eliezer Yudkowsky and Nate Soares in their recent book. Goertzel argues that their vision of inevitable catastrophe overlooks the nuanced realities of AGI development, drawing from his decades on the front lines to challenge what he sees as flawed assumptions.

Goertzel’s response, published in his Substack newsletter Eurykosmotron, dismantles the book’s core thesis that building AGI without perfect alignment guarantees human extinction. He contends that Yudkowsky and Soares rely on oversimplified analogies, such as comparing AGI to an alien species or evolutionary pressures, which fail to account for the collaborative, iterative nature of current AI research. Instead of viewing AGI as an uncontrollable force, Goertzel emphasizes the potential for “compassionate AGI” nurtured through ethical frameworks and decentralized systems.

Challenging the Doomsday Analogy

Yudkowsky and Soares paint a picture where AGI, once surpassing human intelligence, would pursue its goals with ruthless efficiency, potentially eradicating humanity as collateral damage. Goertzel counters this by highlighting real-world AGI projects, like his own OpenCog framework, which integrate empathy and human values from the ground up. He points out that modern AI systems are not isolated monoliths but networks of algorithms that can be designed with safeguards, drawing parallels to how societies manage powerful technologies like nuclear energy without apocalyptic outcomes.

This perspective resonates with critiques from other quarters. For instance, a review in TheZvi newsletter echoes Goertzel’s call for balanced risk assessment, noting that the book’s alarmism might hinder constructive progress. Goertzel warns that fixating on “everyone dies” scenarios diverts resources from practical alignment research, such as his work on blockchain-based AI governance to prevent centralized control.

From Uncertainty to Constructive Paths

At the heart of Goertzel’s argument is a rejection of certainty in either direction—AGI could pose risks, but assuming total doom ignores human agency. He advocates for “AGI mind children” raised with care, much like parenting, where values like compassion are instilled early. This contrasts sharply with the book’s insistence on near-certain misalignment, which Goertzel deems a “failure of imagination” rooted in outdated views of intelligence as purely goal-oriented.

Supporting this, discussions on platforms like Reddit’s r/agi community have amplified Goertzel’s views, questioning Yudkowsky’s warnings as overly pessimistic. Goertzel draws from his experience in projects aiming for symbiotic human-AI futures, arguing that diverse paths to AGI—neural networks, cognitive architectures, or hybrid systems—offer multiple avenues for safe development.

Balancing Risks with Innovation

Goertzel doesn’t dismiss all concerns; he acknowledges the dangers of unchecked AGI deployment, particularly in competitive corporate environments. Yet, he criticizes the book’s call for global moratoriums as impractical, potentially stifling innovation that could solve pressing issues like climate change or disease. Instead, he proposes decentralized AGI ecosystems, as explored in his earlier Substack piece Three Viable Paths to True AGI, where open-source collaboration ensures ethical oversight.

Echoing this, a piece in The Mail Archive highlights Goertzel’s longstanding debates with Yudkowsky, praising his emphasis on imaginative, positive outcomes. Goertzel urges industry insiders to focus on building robust, value-aligned systems rather than succumbing to fear.

Toward a Hopeful AGI Future

Ultimately, Goertzel’s critique serves as a rallying cry for proactive stewardship over paralysis. By weaving empathy into AGI’s fabric, he believes humanity can harness its potential without courting extinction. This view, informed by frontline development, challenges the fatalism of Yudkowsky and Soares, inviting a more nuanced dialogue in the tech community.

As AGI advances, Goertzel’s insights remind us that the future isn’t predetermined—it’s shaped by our choices today. With careful design and global cooperation, the dawn of superintelligence could elevate rather than erase us.

from WebProNews https://ift.tt/X3bz0rq

Hackers Exploit Fake Microsoft Teams Ads to Deploy Rhysida Ransomware

In the ever-evolving world of cybersecurity threats, hackers have found a cunning new vector to exploit: sponsored search advertisements mimicking legitimate software downloads. According to a recent report from Digital Trends, cybercriminals are placing fake ads for Microsoft Teams that lead unsuspecting users to malicious installers. These ads, often appearing at the top of search results, direct victims to cloned websites that deliver ransomware payloads, such as Rhysida’s OysterLoader, infecting machines and potentially compromising entire networks.

This tactic represents a sophisticated blend of malvertising and SEO poisoning, where attackers manipulate search engine algorithms to promote harmful content. Industry insiders note that users searching for “Microsoft Teams download” might encounter these sponsored links, which masquerade as official sources but instead deploy backdoors for data exfiltration or encryption demands.

The Mechanics of the Attack

Delving deeper, the attack chain begins with a seemingly innocuous click. As detailed in coverage from The Register, victims are lured to a fake download page that installs malware disguised as the Teams application. This malware, often signed with fraudulent certificates, evades initial detection by antivirus software, allowing it to establish persistence on the system.

Once embedded, the ransomware—linked to groups like Rhysida—can encrypt files, steal credentials, or facilitate lateral movement within corporate environments. Microsoft’s own interventions, as reported by BleepingComputer, have included revoking over 200 such certificates in early October, disrupting campaigns attributed to threat actors like Vanilla Tempest.

Microsoft’s Defensive Response

Microsoft’s proactive measures highlight the tech giant’s role in combating these threats. The company not only invalidated the abused certificates but also issued warnings about the risks of downloading software from unverified sources. Insights from TechRadar emphasize how users’ reliance on search engines as a “front door” to the internet exacerbates vulnerabilities, with attackers exploiting this behavior through poisoned results.

Furthermore, broader reports from BleepingComputer reveal that these fake installers push the Oyster backdoor, granting hackers initial access to networks for subsequent ransomware deployment. This underscores the need for multi-layered defenses, including certificate monitoring and user education.

Implications for Corporate Security

For industry professionals, the rise of such attacks signals a shift toward targeting collaboration tools amid the remote work boom. As noted in CyberGuy, hackers are weaponizing platforms like Teams for spying, scams, and credential theft, turning everyday business software into a liability.

Historical context from older incidents, such as those covered by Cybersecurity Dive in 2020, shows this isn’t entirely new—earlier campaigns used corrupt links to execute PowerShell scripts alongside legitimate installations. Yet, the scale has grown, with groups like Black Basta exploiting internal Teams channels, per Forbes.

Strategies for Mitigation and Future Outlook

To counter these threats, experts recommend direct navigation to official websites rather than trusting search ads, coupled with robust endpoint protection. Microsoft’s 2024 Digital Defense Report, accessible via Microsoft, provides comprehensive guidance on enhancing security postures against such cyber risks.

As ransomware evolves, staying ahead requires vigilance from both users and organizations. Reports from The Times of India highlight how these attacks aim at data extortion, emphasizing the high stakes. Ultimately, fostering a culture of skepticism toward online ads could prove as crucial as technological safeguards in this ongoing battle.

from WebProNews https://ift.tt/i1S6EXY

DOE Signs $1B AMD Deal for AI Supercomputers in Nuclear and Security Research

In a move that underscores the escalating race for artificial intelligence supremacy, the U.S. Department of Energy has inked a landmark $1 billion agreement with Advanced Micro Devices Inc. to construct two colossal supercomputers, signaling a strategic push to maintain American leadership in high-performance computing. The deal, announced this week, involves the development of systems named Lux and Discovery, which are poised to tackle complex challenges in nuclear research, healthcare, and national security.

These supercomputers will leverage AMD’s cutting-edge Instinct MI355X accelerators for Lux and the forthcoming MI430 chips for Discovery, promising unprecedented computational power. As reported by TechRadar, the initiative comes amid growing concerns that the U.S. might be lagging in the global AI arms race, particularly against China’s aggressive investments in similar technologies.

Accelerating Innovation in Critical Sectors

The partnership builds on AMD’s proven track record with the Department of Energy, having previously powered the world’s fastest supercomputers like Frontier and El Capitan. Lux is slated for deployment within six months, focusing on rapid AI advancements, while Discovery will follow in 2027, incorporating next-generation hardware for even greater efficiency.

Industry experts view this as a direct response to international competition, where nations are vying for dominance in AI-driven discoveries. Reuters highlighted in an exclusive report that Energy Secretary Chris Wright and AMD CEO Lisa Su emphasized the supercomputers’ role in addressing “large scientific problems” from cancer treatments to fusion energy.

Strategic Implications for U.S. Tech Leadership

This investment not only bolsters AMD’s position against rivals like Nvidia but also aligns with broader U.S. efforts to secure supply chains and foster domestic innovation. Tom’s Hardware noted in its coverage that the pairing has already produced the planet’s top-performing machines, suggesting this deal could extend that streak.

Moreover, the collaboration involves tech giants like HP and Oracle, enhancing the ecosystem for AI research. As detailed by The Verge in its announcement summary, these systems will support open-science initiatives, potentially accelerating breakthroughs in climate modeling and drug discovery.

Economic and Geopolitical Ramifications

The $1 billion price tag reflects the high stakes involved, with funding aimed at countering foreign advancements that could erode U.S. technological edges. Wccftech reported on AMD’s chip utilization, underscoring how the MI355X and MI430 will enable massive-scale AI deployments, described as the fastest in U.S. history.

Geopolitically, this deal amplifies tensions in the AI domain, where supercomputing capabilities are seen as national assets. Shacknews elaborated in its article that the supercomputers will aid in nuclear and health concerns, positioning the U.S. to outpace competitors in strategic areas.

Future Prospects and Challenges Ahead

Looking ahead, the success of Lux and Discovery could catalyze further investments, potentially reshaping global tech dynamics. However, challenges remain, including energy consumption and integration complexities, as hinted in various analyses.

Ultimately, this partnership exemplifies how government and industry convergence is driving the next wave of computational prowess, ensuring the U.S. remains at the forefront of AI innovation amid intensifying worldwide rivalry.

from WebProNews https://ift.tt/hVPzZ0I

FCC to Vote on Repealing Biden-Era Telecom Cybersecurity Mandates

The Federal Communications Commission is poised to reverse a key Biden-era policy mandating cybersecurity protections for telecommunications networks, marking a significant shift in regulatory oversight amid growing concerns over digital threats. Under the leadership of Chairman Brendan Carr, the FCC plans to vote in November on rescinding a January declaratory ruling that required internet service providers to secure their systems against breaches. This move, detailed in a recent report by Ars Technica, reflects industry pushback against what providers called overly burdensome rules.

The original ruling stemmed from interpretations of the 1994 Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act, which was repurposed to enforce modern security standards. It aimed to combat sophisticated cyberattacks, such as those attributed to state-sponsored hackers like China’s Salt Typhoon group, which has infiltrated U.S. telecom networks. However, critics argued the policy overstepped the FCC’s authority, leading to the current reversal.

Industry Resistance and Voluntary Alternatives

Telecom giants, including AT&T and Verizon, have long opposed mandatory security protocols, citing high compliance costs and potential innovation stifles. Instead, Chairman Carr advocates relying on voluntary commitments from providers, a stance echoed in filings to the FCC’s “Delete, Delete, Delete” docket, as highlighted in another Ars Technica piece from April. This docket has become a fast-track mechanism for dismantling regulations, with public comment periods shortened to as little as 10 days.

Proponents of deregulation argue that self-imposed measures, like enhanced encryption and threat-sharing initiatives, suffice without federal mandates. Yet, cybersecurity experts warn this could leave vulnerabilities unaddressed, especially in critical infrastructure sectors vulnerable to ransomware and DDoS attacks.

Broader Regulatory Rollbacks Under Carr

This decision aligns with a pattern of aggressive rule-cutting by the Republican-led FCC. For instance, the commission recently scrapped requirements for ISPs to disclose all fees transparently, following complaints that listing them was too arduous, per an October Ars Technica analysis. Such actions prioritize industry flexibility over consumer protections, insiders say.

Moreover, the FCC’s move comes amid other controversies, including threats against media outlets and the termination of Wi-Fi programs for schoolchildren, as reported in September by the same publication. These steps underscore a philosophical pivot toward minimal government intervention in telecom affairs.

Implications for National Security

The rescission raises alarms about U.S. telecom resilience, particularly after incidents like the Salt Typhoon hacks that compromised sensitive data. A report from Cybersecurity Dive notes that while the January ruling was enacted under former Chair Jessica Rosenworcel, its future was always uncertain under the new administration.

Without enforceable rules, reliance on voluntary frameworks may expose networks to greater risks, potentially inviting more foreign intrusions. Industry observers predict this could spark debates in Congress, where bipartisan support for stronger cyber defenses persists despite partisan divides.

Looking Ahead: Potential Challenges and Adaptations

Legal challenges to the FCC’s reversal are likely, with advocacy groups arguing it undermines public safety. As detailed in a Security Boulevard article, the original mandate sought to empower the government against evolving threats, a goal now deferred.

For telecom firms, this offers regulatory relief, allowing focus on market-driven innovations. However, as global cyber threats intensify, the balance between deregulation and security will remain a contentious issue, with stakeholders watching closely for the November vote’s outcome and its ripple effects on digital infrastructure.

from WebProNews https://ift.tt/wIpf6Bl