Google Chrome Drops On-Device AI Privacy Pledge Amid Silent Model Downloads

Google Chrome quietly altered text in its settings this week. The change removes a direct assurance that its on-device AI model keeps user data away from company servers. Privacy researcher Alexander Hanff spotted the edit days after he exposed how the browser downloads a 4GB Gemini Nano model without asking first.

The discovery has stirred fresh doubts about how Google handles local AI. Users expect on-device processing to mean exactly that. No cloud. No telemetry. Yet the company scrubbed the phrase that made that promise explicit.

Hanff runs the site That Privacy Guy. In his May 8 post he laid out the before and after. Earlier Chrome versions told users under the System section that the browser “can use AI models that run directly on your device without sending your data to Google servers.” The sentence vanished. New wording simply notes the models run on device. Turn the toggle off and features might stop working. Nothing more.

The edit lands at a bad moment. Hanff’s earlier report detailed how Chrome drops the Gemini Nano weights.bin file into a folder called OptGuideOnDeviceModel. It happens automatically on capable hardware. No consent dialog. No settings checkbox labeled “download this 4GB AI model.” Delete the files and Chrome fetches them again.

His analysis pulled from macOS filesystem logs. On a fresh profile the directory appeared at 16:38. The weights unpacked minutes later. Smaller models for text safety and prompt routing arrived too. Chrome checks device specs in its Local State file. Performance class 6. Plenty of VRAM. Then it pulls from Google’s edge servers.

At billion-user scale the numbers add up. Each 4GB download burns roughly 0.24 kilowatt-hours. Multiply across hundreds of millions of machines and the electricity and carbon footprint grow large. Hanff calculated potential emissions in the tens of thousands of tonnes of CO2 equivalent. He called the pattern troubling. Similar behavior showed up in software from Anthropic.

Google pushed back. A spokesperson told multiple outlets the model has been available since 2024. It powers scam detection and developer APIs. Data stays off the cloud. The company added a toggle in February. Turn off “On-device GenAI Enabled” or the later “On-device AI” setting and the model deletes. No more downloads or updates.

That statement appeared in coverage from Gizmodo and Engadget. Both ran the company’s words in full. The model uninstalls automatically on low-storage devices. Features like real-time warnings against fake sites run locally.

But the removed text raises questions. Hanff listed three possibilities. The original claim was never accurate. An architecture shift now sends some data back. Or the company simply wants legal breathing room. None sit well. He argued the assurance counted as a binding representation. Users kept the toggle on because they believed it.

Legal experts may take interest. Hanff pointed to the EU’s ePrivacy Directive. Article 5(3) requires consent before storing information on a user’s device. The Gemini Nano download looks like it fails that test. GDPR articles on transparency and data protection by design enter the picture too. Similar rules apply under UK and California law.

Chrome’s market share makes the stakes high. The browser sits on more than 60 percent of desktops and mobiles worldwide. Default settings reach hundreds of millions. Many users never open the System page. They never see the toggle at all.

Earlier coverage from Forbes in January noted the incoming control. The pre-release toggle deleted models tied to scam detection. Google described it as processing locally. No personal data sent to the cloud. The piece captured the tension. Users gained an off switch yet the software had already placed the files without clear notice.

Developers gained new tools. Chrome 148 integrates Gemini Nano through a JavaScript API. Websites can call summarization or rewriting functions that run locally. The promise was speed and privacy. Yet the silent install undercut the message.

Security researchers flagged another issue. The added model expands the browser’s attack surface. Local inference means new code paths. Potential for exploits that never leave the machine. Mozilla has pushed back on similar web AI standards. The open web risks fragmentation when one vendor ships large binaries by default.

Google insists the feature helps users. On-device scam detection spots phishing in real time. Text suggestions stay private. The company points to automatic cleanup on resource-constrained devices. Still the pattern feels familiar. Roll out first. Answer questions later.

Hanff demanded clarity. Confirm whether any data ever left the device. Restore the exact wording if the claim holds. Move to explicit opt-in. He posted the questions publicly and tagged Chrome security leader Parisa Tabriz. No detailed reply has surfaced yet.

The episode highlights a larger shift. Browsers once shipped lean. Now they bundle large language models measured in gigabytes. Storage is cheap for some. Bandwidth costs add up for others. Metered connections in developing markets feel the hit first.

Users can act. Open Chrome settings. Head to System. Flip the on-device AI control off. The model should remove itself. Flags at chrome://flags let power users dig deeper. Enterprise policies offer stronger blocks. But most people won’t bother.

And that is the point. Default behavior shapes what millions experience. When the default includes a multi-gigabyte download and then drops the privacy language that justified it, trust erodes. Google built its brand on search and speed. Privacy rhetoric helped too. The latest moves test how far that rhetoric stretches.

Recent reporting from Tom’s Hardware tied the download to possible EU law violations and large energy waste. The piece echoed Hanff’s calculations. At scale the electricity burned for initial distribution alone rivals small-country consumption.

Tech observers watch closely. Browser engines compete. Chrome’s decisions set expectations for everyone. If local AI becomes table stakes then consent, transparency and resource costs must improve. Otherwise users grow numb. They accept the bloat. They ignore the toggles. And the quiet accumulation of models on their drives continues.

The text change itself is small. One sentence gone. Yet it signals discomfort. Google no longer wants to make that particular promise in plain view. The reason matters. Users deserve to know it. So far the company has offered general statements but not the specifics Hanff requested.

Chrome will keep evolving. New versions arrive every few weeks. AI features will expand. The question is whether the company learns from this episode. Clear communication. Honest defaults. Or the cycle of silent rollout, public surprise and partial walk-back repeats.

For now the 4GB model sits on countless machines. The privacy sentence is gone. And the conversation about what on-device really means has only grown louder.

from WebProNews https://ift.tt/AlxO09P

Samsung’s Foldables Face a Chip Divide: Snapdragon Dominance for Z Fold 8, Uncertainty Looms for Flip 8

Samsung prepares its 2026 foldable lineup amid fresh questions about processor choices. Recent leaks point to a continued split strategy. The Galaxy Z Fold 8 and an all-new wider variant will rely on Qualcomm’s latest Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. The Galaxy Z Flip 8? Its path remains less clear.

Industry observers have watched Samsung wrestle with this decision for years. Once, all foldables carried Snapdragon chips exclusively. That changed with the Z Flip 7. Now signs suggest the book-style models will stick with Qualcomm while the clamshell tests Samsung’s own silicon again. But nothing stands final until the summer Unpacked event.

Tipster Erencan Yılmaz uncovered the details in Samsung source code. Both the standard Z Fold 8, model SM-F976, and the rumored Z Fold 8 Wide, model SM-F971, list the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 “for Galaxy.” The custom tune promises higher clocks and deeper software integration than standard versions. Android Authority first reported the code findings on May 7, 2026.

The Z Fold 8 Wide represents Samsung’s direct answer to potential competition from Apple. Its taller aspect ratio when closed aims for a more passport-like feel. Pairing it with the top-tier Snapdragon avoids risks that often plague first-generation devices. Performance consistency matters here. So does thermal headroom for the larger unfolded screen.

Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 builds on the current Elite platform. It delivers marked gains in CPU speed and power efficiency. Samsung’s “for Galaxy” editions typically extract even more through factory overclocks and specialized camera pipelines. Expect 12GB or 16GB of RAM alongside the chip. Storage options could reach 1TB.

Yet the real story sits with the Z Flip 8. Code references show flexibility. It could ship with Snapdragon or Exynos. Older reports favor the Exynos 2600, Samsung’s 2nm flagship processor that debuted in some Galaxy S26 models. Android Headlines noted this uncertainty just yesterday, highlighting how the smaller foldable might test Samsung’s growing confidence in its in-house designs.

Samsung’s processor balancing act carries real consequences for battery life, heat, and regional availability.

Flip-style devices face different demands than book-style ones. Their compact form leaves less room for cooling. Battery capacity stays tighter. A processor that sips power while delivering snappy performance wins favor. The Exynos 2600 reportedly shines in efficiency metrics. But past generations struggled with sustained loads and modem performance compared with Snapdragon equivalents.

Regional splits have defined Samsung’s flagship approach for over a decade. Snapdragon often lands in the US, China, and select premium markets. Exynos appears elsewhere. The Z Flip 7 broke foldable tradition by adopting Exynos more broadly. Some buyers noticed differences. Others did not. The debate continues in enthusiast circles.

Recent supply chain chatter adds another layer. Samsung has explored a custom 2nm version of the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 produced in its own foundries. Qualcomm would need to approve the arrangement. If it happens, the Z Flip 8 could gain a specialized variant tuned for clamshell use cases. But as of this week that possibility remains speculative. No new articles today confirmed movement on the custom chip front.

Power consumption figures matter most for foldables. Users expect all-day endurance despite thin bodies and dual screens. The Snapdragon 8 Elite family already sets high bars for efficiency. Samsung’s version of the Exynos 2600 must match or exceed it. Early S26 feedback suggests the 2nm Exynos has closed much of the gap. Real-world foldable tests will decide if it crosses the line.

Camera processing offers another differentiator. Snapdragon variants often receive optimized imaging pipelines from Qualcomm. Samsung’s own chips lean on its long experience with image signal processors. The Z Fold 8 reportedly eyes a 200MP main sensor. That workload demands strong silicon. A mismatched chip could throttle burst shooting or video features.

And then there is the wider market picture. Chinese rivals pack ever-stronger foldables with Dimensity or custom chips. Apple rumors swirl around a 2026 or 2027 foldable iPhone. Samsung wants no weak links. Uniform Snapdragon deployment across the Z Fold 8 trio would simplify development and marketing. But cost, supply, and strategic foundry goals pull in other directions.

The Z Fold 8 Wide could prove the most interesting test case. Its unique proportions require software tuning. Hardware must support larger unfolded real estate without draining the battery faster. Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 gives engineers a known quantity. They can focus on hinge improvements, crease reduction, and new One UI 9 features instead of silicon unknowns.

Launch timing looks set for July. Samsung has shifted its summer event to London this year, according to multiple supply chain sources. Three foldables could debut together: the standard Z Fold 8, the Z Fold 8 Wide, and the Z Flip 8. Pricing remains unknown but expectations run high for the wider model.

Buyers care about more than just the processor name. They want reliable performance, long battery life, smooth displays with minimal creasing, and cameras that deliver. The chip decision influences all of it. A Snapdragon-only approach for premium book-style foldables would signal confidence in Qualcomm’s platform. An Exynos-powered Flip 8 would show Samsung believes its own silicon has matured enough for high-volume consumer devices.

Either outcome carries risks. Past Exynos models drew criticism for throttling and modem issues in certain regions. Snapdragon versions sometimes cost more to produce. Samsung must weigh these factors against its goal of reducing reliance on external suppliers while maintaining product excellence.

So the leaks leave us with a partial map. Clear Snapdragon territory for the Z Fold 8 family. Foggy ground for the Z Flip 8. Expect more details to surface in the coming weeks as firmware and certification filings appear. By July the picture should sharpen. Until then speculation fills the gap.

One fact stands firm. Samsung’s foldable business now drives significant revenue. Processor choices will shape its competitive edge for the next generation. The company cannot afford missteps. The market watches closely. So do its rivals.

from WebProNews https://ift.tt/YrmVsAp

Rivian Plots R2 Pickup and More: CEO Hints at Expanded Lineup Beyond the SUV

Rivian has begun rolling R2 SUVs off the line in Normal, Illinois. Deliveries kick off this spring. Yet the story doesn’t stop at one body style. CEO RJ Scaringe recently signaled that more versions sit in the works. An R2 pickup. Perhaps an R2X. The platform’s flexibility opens doors.

The main R2 arrives in stages. First comes the Performance trim with Launch Package. It starts at $57,990. Dual motors deliver 656 horsepower. Zero to 60 arrives in 3.6 seconds. Range hits an estimated 330 miles. Rivian positions it as the most capable on and off road.

Premium models follow later in 2026 at $53,990. They offer 450 horsepower. Standard rear-wheel-drive versions debut in early 2027 from $48,490. A cheaper variant around $45,000 lands late that year with over 275 miles of range. Rivian expects 20,000 to 25,000 R2 deliveries in 2026. That figure helps push total volume to 62,000-67,000 vehicles. (Reuters, April 22, 2026)

Platform Sets Stage for Variety

Scaringe spoke carefully in recent interviews. “So clearly there could be an R2X,” he told one outlet. “There’s going to be combinations… I want to be careful not to announce the program.” The comments surfaced as production ramps. They echo the approach Rivian took with its first generation. The R1T pickup and R1S SUV sprang from shared bones. Now the smaller R2 platform repeats the trick. (Ars Technica, May 2026)

Manufacturing choices make it possible. The Normal plant can build 155,000 R2s a year alongside existing R1 output. The Georgia factory, slated for 2028, adds capacity for 300,000 vehicles. It will handle R2, R3, R3X and even robotaxis for Uber. Fewer parts. Simplified electronics. Two and a half miles less wiring than the R1. All of it trims cost and complexity. The bill of materials for R2 sits at roughly half the R1’s. That efficiency matters when scaling variants.

Buyers already see the appeal. Reservations poured in after the initial reveal. The R2 measures midsize. It competes with the Tesla Model Y yet keeps Rivian’s adventure focus. Towing reaches 4,400 pounds on higher trims. Ground clearance and drive modes support trails. Semi-active suspension smooths the ride. Yet the real promise lies in what comes next.

And the variants could broaden the audience fast. A pickup version would give Rivian a smaller truck option. It might pull in buyers who want utility without R1T size or price. An R2X could add rugged flair. Think wider fenders, lifted stance, unique badging. Scaringe avoided firm commitments. Still, the Georgia plant’s flexible lines suggest room to experiment without heavy retooling.

Recent coverage picked up the thread. “Rivian CEO hints at R2 pickup and R2X variants as production ramps,” noted one report today. Discussions on X echoed excitement mixed with caution. Will the $45,000 model arrive on time? Can Rivian hit volume targets while burning cash? The company delivered 42,247 vehicles last year. R2 must accelerate growth. (The Truth About Cars, May 6, 2026)

Executives point to lessons learned. “R2 embodies so many of our learnings that we have accumulated,” Scaringe said in March. The team simplified. They refined interiors with new wood accents and premium audio. Features like the Rivian Torch flashlight and Dynamic Adventure Lighting carry over the brand DNA. Autonomy+ hardware arrives on later builds. Gen 3 chips and LiDAR prepare for advanced driver assistance.

But challenges remain. Initial R2 production weighs on margins. The ramp starts slow. First units focus on validation. Full volume builds through the second half of 2026. A tornado recently hit the Normal plant. Output continued anyway. Such resilience helps. So does the $4.5 billion Department of Energy loan that supports Georgia construction.

Rivian isn’t alone in chasing multiple body styles from one platform. BMW mastered the tactic years ago. The 3 Series spawned sedans, wagons, coupes, convertibles. Rivian adapts the idea to EVs. Shared skateboard chassis. Common battery packs in two sizes. Modular interiors. The strategy spreads development expense across higher volumes. It also lets the company test market reaction before committing fully.

Analysts watch closely. Success with R2 could fund further expansion. Failure would tighten the runway. Cash burn stays a concern. Yet enthusiasm for the product runs high. Prototypes impressed early drivers with handling and refinement. Range estimates look competitive. Pricing undercuts many premium rivals once the base model arrives.

So Rivian moves forward on two fronts. It launches the core SUV in phases. At the same time it explores derivatives. No firm dates for the pickup or R2X. Details stay guarded. But the CEO’s words make clear the intent. One platform. Multiple expressions. The R2 isn’t just an SUV. It’s a foundation.

Production timelines could shift. Supply chains tighten. Customer demand must hold. Still, the direction feels set. Rivian aims to move past niche adventurer brand into something broader. Affordable. Versatile. Capable in varied forms. The coming months will test execution. For industry watchers the R2 variants represent more than added SKUs. They signal how the company intends to scale.

from WebProNews https://ift.tt/3HntoRX

T-Mobile’s Starlink-Powered T-Satellite Crosses Borders: Canada and New Zealand Join the Network

T-Mobile customers wandering remote Canadian backcountry or New Zealand’s rugged trails now have a lifeline from the sky. The carrier’s T-Satellite service, built on SpaceX’s Starlink direct-to-cell technology, just expanded beyond U.S. borders. Coverage now reaches Canada through a partnership with Rogers and New Zealand via One NZ. Reciprocal deals mean Rogers and One NZ users get T-Satellite access stateside. Android Police first flagged the quiet rollout on T-Mobile’s site. Dead zones? They’re shrinking fast.

Picture this: no cell towers in sight. Your phone auto-switches to satellites overhead. Texting works. Apps like WhatsApp, X, Google Maps fire up. All you need is a clear view of the sky. T-Mobile bundles it free with top plans like Experience Beyond. Others pay $10 monthly—even AT&T or Verizon folks via eSIM add-on. That’s the hook. Competitors’ customers buy in. T-Mobile touts over 500,000 square miles of U.S. reach, now plus international roaming spots.

But how did we get here? T-Satellite beta kicked off last year. By July 2025, commercial launch hit with 650-plus Starlink satellites in low-Earth orbit. Beta users—1.8 million strong—sent a million messages from unreachable spots, like national parks. T-Mobile CEO Mike Sievert called it a ‘huge step’ to end dead zones, per his X post. October brought data for apps: AllTrails for hikers, AccuWeather for storms, even Samsung Find for lost gear. T-Mobile’s announcement listed dozens of partners.

Expansion builds on that. T-Mobile’s support page confirms: ‘T-Satellite international coverage is available in additional countries through our partnerships with: Canada – Rogers Satellite, New Zealand – One NZ.’ More destinations loom, via global roaming ties and SpaceX. T-Mobile support. Jeff Giard, T-Mobile VP of Business Development, said the mission is ‘to extend coverage to places no cell signal has ever reached.’ Rogers echoed: combining their service with T-Satellite gives ‘the most coverage in Canada and the U.S.’ X users buzzed; @muskonomy noted partnerships with existing SpaceX allies.

Devices? Over 60 models qualify: iPhone 13-plus, Samsung Galaxy S21 and up, Pixel 9/10, recent Motorolas. No mods needed. Auto-activates on signal loss. Usage spikes in wilds—Angeles National Forest, Grand Canyon, Yellowstone—per Speedtest data shared on X. First responders tap it too; Motorola Solutions integrated with T-Mobile for APX NEXT radios.

Competitors scramble. AT&T and Verizon partner with AST SpaceMobile, but launches lag. Beta tests flop on speed; one X user griped about 10-minute texts pointing at satellites. T-Satellite? Seamless handover, per PhoneArena. Recent whispers of Starlink V2 upgrades promise 5G speeds from space—streaming, calls, 100x data capacity by 2027. The Street says it’ll challenge rivals hard.

Limits persist. Delays in emergencies. Not for daily grind—cellular rules there. T-Mobile admits usage below forecasts, mostly parks. Still, disasters prove it: winter storms, hurricanes. Florida’s $2 billion network push included T-Satellite rollout. RCR Wireless.

And the business angle. T-Mobile grabs rivals’ subscribers at $10 a pop. Non-U.S. roaming hooks travelers. Starlink’s constellation grows; partnerships multiply. Rogers beta in Canada mirrors it. One NZ too. X chatter from @XFreeze calls it T-Mobile ‘going international.’ Analysts eye ad potential in remote reaches, per eMarketer.

So where next? T-Mobile hints at oceans, more nations. SpaceX’s global push accelerates. Carriers worldwide eye direct-to-cell. T-Mobile leads—for now. Users in Alaska’s south, Puerto Rico, Hawaii already roam free. Canada, New Zealand join. Your phone’s range just stretched. Dramatically.

from WebProNews https://ift.tt/eWZxNUM

Amazon Unlocks Its Vast Logistics Machine for Every Business, Rattling UPS and FedEx

Amazon.com Inc. just threw open the doors to its colossal supply chain. No longer reserved for its own retail empire or third-party sellers on its platform. Now, any company—from manufacturers to retailers—can tap the same freight, warehousing, fulfillment, and last-mile delivery systems that move billions of packages yearly. The move, announced Monday, launches Amazon Supply Chain Services, a unified console where businesses pick and choose from the e-commerce giant’s arsenal of logistics tools. Shares of UPS and FedEx tumbled more than 6% in response, signaling Wall Street’s quick read on the threat. Reuters called it a direct challenge to the logistics heavyweights.

Peter Larsen, vice president of Amazon Supply Chain Services, laid it out plainly in a company blog post. “Amazon is bringing the infrastructure, intelligence, and scale of its supply chain services—proven over decades—to businesses everywhere, much like Amazon Web Services did for cloud computing,” he wrote. TechCrunch highlighted the parallel first. That AWS analogy isn’t hype. AWS turned Amazon’s internal computing needs into a $100 billion annual business. This could do the same for physical goods movement.

Early sign-ups prove the appeal. Procter & Gamble, 3M, Lands’ End, and American Eagle Outfitters already use parts of the network. P&G, for instance, handles raw materials to finished products across industries like healthcare and automotive. AboutAmazon detailed how the service spans inbound freight from factories, bulk storage, order fulfillment, and parcel delivery to any sales channel. Businesses log in via a single dashboard—no Amazon seller account required. Pick ocean freight from China straight to U.S. warehouses. Or air cargo to Europe. Amazon’s AI-driven forecasting optimizes it all, predicting demand and placing inventory near customers.

Amazon didn’t build this overnight. Over 20 years, it poured billions into a network that now includes over 175 fulfillment centers worldwide, more than 100 cargo planes via Amazon Air, 80,000 trailers, and a fleet of delivery vans. Independent sellers already ship 5 billion items yearly through it, per earlier company data. AboutAmazon noted the scale back in 2025. The company handles over half its U.S. deliveries in-house, cutting reliance on outsiders. Now, that efficiency goes on sale. Wall Street Journal reported Larsen saying, “We first built this network over 20 years for ourselves. We then made it available to Amazon sellers. Now we’re making it available to any business of any shape or size.”

But why now? E-commerce growth slowed post-pandemic. Amazon seeks new revenue streams beyond retail ads and Prime fees. Third-party logistics already powers services like Fulfillment by Amazon and Multi-Channel Fulfillment, which expanded to Walmart, Shopify, and Shein sellers last year. PYMNTS covered that step. ASCS takes it further. No marketplace tie needed. Retailers. Wholesalers. Even B2B manufacturers. All qualify. The centralized platform integrates over 100 APIs, slashing setup time from weeks to days for partners.

Competition heats up fast. UPS and FedEx built empires on parcel dominance. Amazon’s edge? Scale plus data. Its algorithms track every package in real time, dodging disruptions better than rivals. Healthcare firms gain cold-chain options for drugs. Automotive suppliers speed parts to assembly lines. Logistics Management pointed to those wins. Shares reaction was swift. FedEx plunged as investors eyed margin squeezes. Amazon stock? It hit fresh highs, up nearly 1% amid the buzz. X posts lit up with traders calling it “AWS for logistics.” One from @Stocktwits summed it: Amazon turning its supply chain into a third-party platform.

Risks lurk, though. Amazon’s network strains during peaks—think holiday crushes. Opening wider could amplify that. Regulators watch antitrust closely; this expands Amazon’s grip on commerce infrastructure. Still, early momentum suggests uptake. Hundreds of thousands of sellers already trust it for millions of packages. BusinessWire echoed the official launch. And the partner program dangles funding incentives for integrators.

So Amazon flips a cost center into profit potential. UPS and FedEx scramble. Businesses everywhere get a shortcut to world-class logistics. The supply chain wars just got physical.

from WebProNews https://ift.tt/pbBPmdL

Streetlights as AI Powerhouses: Nigeria’s 50,000-Lamp Data Center Network Challenges Grid Giants

Warwickshire’s Conflow Power Group just struck a deal with Nigeria’s Katsina State. Fifty thousand solar-powered lampposts. Each one packing a Nvidia chip. Networked into Africa’s first distributed AI data center. No grid power needed. That’s the pitch. And it’s already moving forward.

Traditional data centers guzzle 300 megawatts from the grid. They demand millions of liters of cooling water daily. Construction drags on for years. Conflow’s iLamps flip that script. A cylindrical solar panel tops each post. It charges batteries. Those feed a 15-watt Nvidia chip inside. Link 50,000 together, and you get 13.75 petaOPS of compute power. Operational from day one. Sun-powered. Grid-free. As Digital Trends reports, this setup sidesteps the massive infrastructure headaches plaguing AI buildouts elsewhere.

But these aren’t just compute nodes. Cameras embedded in the iLamps spot speeding cars. They catch parking violations. Flag seatbelt lapses. Number plate recognition runs in real time. Facial recognition sits on the roadmap—for finding missing people or suspects. Public WiFi and Bluetooth beam out too. In Katsina, traffic fines will fill state coffers. Conflow takes 20% after three years. Rental fees from AI firms using the processing power fund a green bond. That covers installs and upkeep.

Edward Fitzpatrick, Conflow’s chairman, credits Nvidia directly. “NVIDIA is the company that’s created a small enough chip, powered with 15 watts of power, so it can be powered by solar, and we can put that inside a street light,” he told BBC News. Security? Tamper with the chip, and it fries. Posts already run in a UK hospital car park, handling CCTV and plates. Now Katsina gets an assembly factory. Units ship from Morocco, Taiwan, Latvia too.

Dr. Hafiz Ibrahim Ahmad, Katsina’s special adviser on power and energy, calls it groundbreaking. “Home to the only distributed AI data centre of its kind anywhere on the African continent… could mean safer streets, real-time crime and terrorism prevention, free public internet and a revenue stream that flows back into the state,” he said in the BBC piece. Negotiations span seven Nigerian states, universities, institutions. Scale to 300,000 units. Africa’s biggest distributed AI network.

So why Nigeria? Sunshine abounds. Rules bend easier. Fitzpatrick again: “Africa is our prime target because there’s plenty of sunshine which is great, they’ve got more relaxed rules and regulations, they want us to put the street lights on the street.” Florida talks bubble too—with schools eyeing surveillance and interactive features like gesture voting.

Experts temper the hype. Prof. Ian Bitterlin, a data center veteran, flags physical security risks on streets. Communication lags between distant posts kill heavy AI training—like for large language models. John Booth of Carbon3IT agrees. iLamps suit light tasks. Think edge computing access points. Like phone masts feeding bigger centers. They supplement. Don’t supplant.

This lands amid AI infrastructure chaos. Half of U.S. data centers planned for 2026 face delays or cancellation, per a Yahoo Tech report citing Bloomberg. Power shortages. Supply chains snag. Elsewhere, hyperscalers chase wild fixes: SpaceX eyes orbital data centers. Microsoft tested underwater ones. Meta beams space solar. iLamps? Grounded. Practical. Distributed.

Privacy shadows loom. Facial recognition invites bias, misuse. Conflow pledges legal compliance. But streets become eyes everywhere. E-waste warnings grow too—AI strains resources, as Digital Trends notes. Solar changes that math. No rare earths in chips alone. Batteries cycle. Posts endure.

Scale works here. Katsina’s deal proves viability. Revenue sustains it. Edge AI thrives on low latency—lampposts sit where data generates: roads, parks, crowds. Not remote warehouses. Global grids buckle under AI thirst. U.S. operators predict gigawatt shortfalls. Zoning fights erupt, from Wisconsin to Boston. Nigeria sidesteps. Builds on sunlight.

Conflow’s CEO Edward Fitzpatrick frames the shift. “This agreement is a defining moment for how the world thinks about AI infrastructure,” he said in statements covered by Punch Nigeria. Katsina’s 13.75 petaOPS arrives via posts. Sun-fueled. Instant. No 300-megawatt drain.

Critics doubt full replacement. Fair. But for inference? Local analytics? Surveillance feeds? Perfect fit. Multiply by thousands. You cluster compute where needed. Bandwidth bottlenecks ease—process nearby. Global south leads. Others watch. Or catch up.

from WebProNews https://ift.tt/vZIBLcQ

Rivian’s Hidden Trade-Off: Kill Connectivity for Privacy, Lose Navigation and Updates

Electric-vehicle makers promise adventure on four wheels. Rivian delivers rugged trucks and SUVs wired for the digital age. But that wiring sends data back home—relentlessly. Owners now face a stark choice: keep the features flowing, or cut the cord entirely. Rivian Support lays it out plainly: ‘Vehicle connectivity is a core feature of Rivian vehicles. If you choose to disable all vehicle connectivity, it will prevent data from leaving the vehicle, but it will also limit or disable certain functionality in the vehicle (e.g., navigation, active lane centering, and over-the-air updates, which provide new features, better performance, safety enhancements, and bug fixes).’

Canadian owners flip a toggle in the ‘Data and Privacy’ screen. Everyone else books a service appointment to kill the eSIM. Subscriptions like Connect+ keep running regardless; cancel those separately. Simple enough. Or is it?

Data streams from Rivian rigs include telemetry on speed, braking, battery charge, steering, even seat-belt use. Cameras capture cabin gazes for driver monitoring. Exterior lenses snap road scenes for ADAS tweaks. GPS pins precise spots—home, work, charging stops. The May 2024 Data Privacy Notice spells out the haul: vehicle state, dynamics, torque, odometer readings, crash details with video clips tied to your VIN.

Owners tweak settings via the infotainment screen. Turn off precise location sharing for navigation, Highway Assist, the app, analytics. Opt out of camera data uploads for product improvements. Disable interior camera processing—though it stays in standby. But. Safety nets persist. ‘Your precise location will be shared with Rivian for critical safety purposes regardless of your choices for location data sharing, such as SOS calls, crash investigation, and regulatory reporting,’ warns the owner’s manual, as noted on Rivian Forums. General location—a 7-mile radius—flows anyway.

And here’s the pivot: Full cutoff demands sacrifice.

No maps. No lane-keeping. No software patches. Updates deliver bug fixes, range boosts, safety upgrades. Disconnect, and your R1T or R1S freezes in time. Forums buzz with hacks—yank the TCM module or antenna for true silence. Users like Steve A. argue: ‘you should not HAVE TO sacrifice privacy when buying ANY product.’ Others dismiss fears; one exported 12 months of data—daily VIN, odometer, rough lat-long, speed stats—and called it ‘meaningless.’ Yet GM’s OnStar saga lingers: sold driving scores to insurers, jacking rates.

Rivian insists it doesn’t sell data or share with insurers without consent, per support pages like Do you share my driving data with insurance companies?. Affiliates get telemetry for underwriting. Service providers crunch analytics. Crashes trigger automatic video sends. Legal demands? Minimal disclosure. Tax credits? VIN and charge spots to Uncle Sam.

Industry peers vary. Consumer Reports (March 2025) maps opt-outs: Ford toggles in SYNC, Tesla in Software settings, GM demands a call to OnStar. None offer Rivian’s nuclear option—total eSIM disable—without strings. Tesla claims anonymized fleets; no VIN ties. But scrutiny mounts as robotaxis loom, hungry for miles.

Recent chatter amplifies. Hacker News threads, surfaced on X via @betterhn20 (April 30, 2026), hail Rivian’s toggle amid broader auto-data debates. One post: ‘Rivian allows you to disable all internet connectivity.’ No fresh scandals, but X users flag Ford F-150s snitching unwittingly.

Privacy hawks cheer controls. The interior camera ships off by default on 2025 models. Gear Guard videos stay local unless you say otherwise. Clear Settings wipes profiles before resale—though cloud telemetry lingers.

Trade-offs sting. Off-grid adventurers might embrace dumb mode: pure electric torque, no phoning home. Urban commuters? Stuck choosing between convenience and caution. Rivian bets connectivity sells—95% of owners stay linked, insiders guess. But as data brokers circle, that toggle gleams brighter.

Regulators watch. California rights demand access, deletion. Europe pushes GDPR opt-outs. Rivian complies, posting changes at rivian.com/privacy/notice (last May 2025). Yet forums reveal gaps: API leaks, vampire drain myths.

Bottom line. Rivian hands real power—disable and data dies. At a cost. Your call.

from WebProNews https://ift.tt/MnfJbuZ